Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: gif, jpg, png, txt, tpl, lng, ini, pvd, psf, ini, cfg, csv, zip, xml, pas, 7z
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 1024KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many words are in this question?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: korbenPL
« on: February 09, 2010, 05:25:10 pm »

this second it became clear to me and now seeing your confirmation makes me smile - foobar could do it, PVD can do it too

in line to get it the minute it comes out, ideally before august 2010 ;)
Posted by: nostra
« on: February 09, 2010, 12:38:07 pm »

Quote
that's novum...meaning it's like v16 RC1 or what?

Meaning a major release 1.0.0.0
Posted by: korbenPL
« on: February 09, 2010, 07:36:08 am »

cause everyone wants ther piece of the long-awaited updated soft  8)

 
Quote
Version 1 development
that's novum...meaning it's like v16 RC1 or what?
Posted by: buah
« on: February 09, 2010, 07:32:39 am »

And look at us like vultures:"Where's my peace of meat, no me first, get back..." :):):)
Now it works like a charm.
Thanks!
Posted by: nostra
« on: February 09, 2010, 01:31:33 am »

I have just uploaded it ;)
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: February 09, 2010, 01:23:01 am »

That's better.

The automatic update system didn't pick that up either. ;)
Posted by: nostra
« on: February 09, 2010, 01:15:03 am »

Oh shit, I accidentally included the old version of imdb plugin. Please get the version 0.9.2.4 from the download page. I am updating the installation files now...
Posted by: buah
« on: February 09, 2010, 12:23:01 am »

I just imported data for an empty entry "12 Angry Men". Still no rank. To be precise it's not null, but it got value "0" (zero).

Still no luck?
Posted by: nostra
« on: February 07, 2010, 02:33:07 pm »

I plan to release the next version in a day or two...
Posted by: korbenPL
« on: February 07, 2010, 01:13:05 pm »

Just entered the thrad after failing to get the ratings...

we're still waiting for v15?
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: February 03, 2010, 07:50:00 pm »

That also seems to be fixed. The plugin has been updated in version 15, which is to be released soon. I suggest you wait and test again with the new release.
Posted by: buah
« on: February 03, 2010, 10:57:44 am »

But, I faced with the most recent issue.

IMDb Tech Spec, defined as a memo field, now is filled in with such data:
.rto2010navstripe a:link, .rto2010navstripe a:visited, .rto2010navstripe a:hover {   color: #fff !important;}.rto2010navstripe {   font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px;        
margin-bottom: 4px;}

If the field was empty, it got only that text Edit: if there were no Tech Specs found at IMDb. While updating Tech Specs field already containing information, mentioned text is imported in addition. Existing data wasn't overwrited, it was "merged" with the text above.

I use IMDB-v0.9.2.3-English-399 Kb-09.01.2010 plugin
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: February 03, 2010, 08:05:03 am »

That confirms it then...it seems to be fixed in version 15, to be released soon.
Posted by: buah
« on: February 03, 2010, 07:40:10 am »

I never had a problem with votes. I just imported data for an empty entry "12 Angry Men". Still no rank. To be precise it's not null, but it got value "0" (zero).
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: February 02, 2010, 10:06:41 pm »

Update: Sometime after my last post, I "discovered" the votes and rank were being updated in some movies and not others. Investigating further today, I find the one movie that made me think that was the case had somehow had an incorrect URL added (it was for a TV production of the same name that had no votes). Now I'm unable to find a movie that will not update properly, so I have to conclude the problem was with the bad URL, not the plugin.

Is anyone else still having a problem getting votes and/or rank?
Posted by: buah
« on: January 24, 2010, 09:12:16 pm »

Until then, I'm importing posters and covers. :)
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: January 23, 2010, 10:36:50 pm »

But I can confirm what buah has observed. To be a little more specific, the plugin is saving NULL to the selected rank field—any existing value is deleted.

I'm still hoping this will be fixed.
Posted by: mgpw4me@yahoo.com
« on: January 12, 2010, 10:12:20 pm »

I've only learned 2 things as a programmer that are generally applicable to life.

1) Not every problem can be fixed with technology
2) Status quo is often the best solution until a permanent solution has decided upon
Posted by: rick.ca
« on: January 12, 2010, 08:03:04 pm »

I was thinking along the lines of a brute-force user test. Like downloading a set of reasonably static records that covers all data types, exporting everything to text, and then comparing that to the previous test to identify any new errors or omissions.
Posted by: mgpw4me@yahoo.com
« on: January 12, 2010, 05:33:32 pm »

I'm surprised the "Please God, Now" didn't work, but it really does seem to be broken. Maybe by the same website change that broke the rating, but wasn't noticed. I wonder if we can devise a test to determine whether the plugin is fully functional at any point in time.

Quick sanity check for rating:

if ( Rating = FloatToStr(StrToFloat(Rating)) then
 we have a usable rating
else
 the script is broken or you need to check if there is a reason there is no rating...not enough user ratings submitted for example

Test:
  Rating = '', conversion results in '0.0' ... not equal, bad rating
  Rating = 'some text value', conversion results in '0.0'...not equal, bad rating
  Rating = '1.0', conversion results in '1.0', equal, good rating

With a bad rating value, the script should not even attempt to add one to the database.  In silent mode there isn't much that can be done, but a showmessage('rating not acquired...' + reason ) could be displayed in 'user' mode. 

Any time a valid value is 'missed', it should be considered that the parsing may need to be done at a lower level.  For example:
<td>rating</td>
changes to
<td class='rating'>rating</td>
If you were using <td> as the start of text indicator, then you'd consider using <td, then parse until you found the matching '>', at which point you'd have the start of text position, you could look for the text termination character sequence.

Writing this type of code for every value is possible, but very time consuming, and since code (to my knowledge) is not sharable between program (ie. #include common_routines.psf) you'd have to change every program that used it when changes were made.  When you consider the shear volume of code involved in this project, it's easy to understand why this hasn't been done.