Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: gif, jpg, png, txt, tpl, lng, ini, pvd, psf, ini, cfg, csv, zip, xml, pas, 7z
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 1024KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the fifth word in this sentence?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: itsme
« on: January 17, 2014, 08:45:35 pm »

I found out this happens only, when I use ffmpeg for the creation of the screenshots. When I use MS Directshow file size is growing much slowlier. Unfortunately not all movie are avi...

I have ffdshow installed, perhaps this interferes with the ffmpeg you use?
Posted by: itsme
« on: January 17, 2014, 09:08:46 am »

thanks for your reply. I selected only "delete invisible movies and actors orphans" and of course the last point: cleaning database.
Before adding the movies I made a copy, so I could compare both files. Adding the movies (without screenshots) did not change the size of the database at all.
Posted by: nostra
« on: January 17, 2014, 12:49:52 am »

Sounds strange indeed. What options did you select for optimization?
Posted by: itsme
« on: January 17, 2014, 12:21:16 am »

Hello, in my database there are about 2000 movies, each with 3 screenshots, most of them with also a poster. Filesize is appr. 500MB. This makes 0,25 MB per movie.

Now I added 100 more movies and created automatically 3 screenshots for each, no posters so far. After that the filesize of my database raised to 1GB, what makes 5 MB for each of the new movies. Is there an explanation for this behavior?

The new movies are nothing special. A database optimisation did not change anything.