Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: gif, jpg, png, txt, tpl, lng, ini, pvd, psf, ini, cfg, csv, zip, xml, pas, 7z
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 1024KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the fifth word in this sentence?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Chris64
« on: November 27, 2013, 10:34:34 pm »


Thanks a lot! :-)
Posted by: nostra
« on: November 27, 2013, 10:10:45 pm »

OK, sounds logical
Posted by: Chris64
« on: November 27, 2013, 08:32:38 pm »

Hello nostra,

currently it looks like the "Display aspect ratio" from mediainfo.dll is used to determine the value
for the the respective database entry in PVD.
May I suggest to use the "Original display aspect ratio" (if available!) from mediainfo.dll in future
versions of PVD instead, since AFAIK this value reflects the DAR of the video container format
which is respected (and used) by almost all modern players like MPC-HC, VLC, SmPlayer etc. ?

TIA Chris