Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: gif, jpg, png, txt, tpl, lng, ini, pvd, psf, ini, cfg, csv, zip, xml, pas, 7z
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 1024KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the fifth word in this sentence?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: afrocuban
« on: September 13, 2013, 10:09:45 am »

Thanks, nostra. I'm using both versions, same situation.
Posted by: nostra
« on: September 12, 2013, 08:56:38 pm »

Movie title should be quick as this field is indexed. There is not much I can do to spead it up. I will take a look if Ican optimize the search for covers. Are you using the latest beta?
Posted by: afrocuban
« on: September 12, 2013, 08:40:24 pm »

Movie title, for example. What is really slow is searching "FronCover IS NULL"", but no alternatives for that query, so I have to wait. It takes at least a minute and a half.
Posted by: nostra
« on: September 12, 2013, 05:35:28 pm »

What is the field you are searching?
Posted by: afrocuban
« on: September 11, 2013, 02:21:02 pm »

I have ~6,5k entries in my database. When I search it, it takes time to get results. So, very often, it's much faster to open Firefox, to enter search criteria at google, to open correspondent  IMDb page to get the results, then to get the very same result in already opened PVD.

So, is there any hint to make PVD database faster, or is it by design? If it's by design, what are the chances for nostra to make it faster?

Thanks in advance