Posted by: rick.ca
« on: May 22, 2012, 12:29:37 am »Quote
This should be correct... I'm sure Rick or Nostra can confirm it.
Sounds right, although I can't think of any good reason to continue changing from one to the other. The only case I can think of for maintaining images outside the database is if the same images are to be shared by other applications. And that doesn't include most media manager applications—which would require them to be exported beside the media files anyway. So maybe an image editor is used to modify and maintain the images. Most users, however, would be happy to do whatever modifications are necessary immediately after download, and then save the result in the database. They can always be saved externally again (individually) for making further modifications.
Okay, I can think of one good reason. That would be to move all images outside the database so they can be processed in bulk by an external editor to resize and/or optimize them. Once that's done, they can be brought back into the database and the database optimized. I don't know if there's any advantage to doing one of those steps first.